Pdoggg

This is the somewhat strange looking woman who supervised the forced rectal feeding in the secret Thai detention center and is now nominated to be America's top spook.

Lilly Liu is American (I think) of Chinese decent and is looking good! Hot or Not?

One of the techniques used at Detention Site Green was rectal force feeding.

That's one stop shopping! Here's a link to Couchsurfing

Those hotel prices are crazy as they generally are. But beyond the money, I prefer dealing with the lady washing my clothes as the more middlemen involved the more likely something will get lost.

Lots of good info in your report Mr Dobbs! Like you, I prefer to make the offer, especially in situations where I know it will be accepted. The alternative, by asking how much, too often leads into a negotiation and who wants that prior to sex. My buddy Eyemahk convinced me of this many moons ago. Of course every guy has different methods but it has always worked for me. Some guys don't like to talk price at all, but generally these are guys who for their own personal reasons actually prefer paying more than most guys, maybe the baht or piso amounts are so meaningless to them, why not pay more or maybe they want to make sure that they are first in line the next time.

Was always curious; she was my neighbor for many years. She first worked at Cat's Bar, the place in Soi Day Night owned by Swiss Rudy. Pat got much better known form her stint at So What on Soi Half A Dozen.

My plan was to wander around the Middle Floor. Although I've had good times in Charades, formerly Cascade, the last time i had a problem with the mamasan so just go to other bars. Didn't have time for what I think is now called True Obsessions. I was mostly just curious about the newer places. Had no intention of pulling from Nana given the inflated price expectations plus a barfine. I would be surprised if anyone got turned down on the street if saying, "700 baht, OK" which leads me to believe that one could even offer 500 baht but I don't think it is a great idea to offer 500 baht, but that is just me, it doesn't feel right. The shitpits are great if you enjoy the experience but if you don't like drinking the street is more cost effective. There is a perception that the girls on the street are dangerous but I think that is way overblown. However if that is a big concern for someone or the street is just not your style then taking a ladyboy from a well run bar like Why Not is a good option. I think Why Not is a zillion time better than the shitpits, it has a friendly atmosphere and beer is a very reasonable 100 baht. Different guys prefer different Ladyboy Distribution Channels. Nowadays, Thai Friendly is extremely popular, but I don't like someone I've never seen showing up at my door. One good friend of mine takes from the street 95% of the time and explained to me he likes the 10 second interview, and then either make an offer or move on. Excluding repeats for which you have a phone number, 4 good distribution channels are 1) Bars 2) Online 3) Street and 4) Massage. What's good about massage is that an hour oil massage is about the same price as a drink and lady drink and you get a nice massage out of the deal. One good buddy of mine gets 95% of his girls that way. Think there is no "best" way, it is just a personal preference.

Perhaps you are on a Ladyboy Safari? Some Pattaya laundries offer a deal for 500 baht where they will do 60-70 pieces of laundry. In years gone by 80 pieces was the norm and one place even offered 90. The 500 baht deal may not be posted, you may have to walk in and ask. Some may not do that deal especially in the most touristy places in town. But if a guy is going to be in Pattaya a few weeks it is a good idea to go into the laundries within easy walking distance and say, "500 baht, how many?" You pay 500 baht up front and when you pick up your first load the receipt will show something like 8 pieces, 52 left if it was 60 pieces for 500. Pay by the kilo doesn't seem common in Pattaya. Generally on islands that price that way, all the laundry shops offer the same deal such as 40 baht per kilo. In Angeles City it was 35 or 40 Piso per kilo, in Cambodia I found a place that was 1 USD per kilo. Some round up to the next quarter kilo, perhaps most common the next half kilo, some maybe to the next kilo.

Had to go to Bangkok recently just for one night only. Why Not was closed that night, bad timing for me, so I checked out Nana Plaza and here are my personal observations. Seems like the 2nd floor is where the biggest concentration of Ladyboy Bars so went up the left staircase and saw a girl with a sign that said Beer Chang for 95 in Chilli Bar so figured I'd start my night there. Don't know if the 95 baht promotion is all the time. I entered around 10:30. Sat in the second row so as to keep my distance from all the girls offering to come down and sit with me. Mostly silicone girls. They weren't bad looking, just not to appealing to me. But can't go wrong at a 95 baht beer which is probably cheaper than Stumble Inn. Next stop was DC 10. Probably the least attractive girls of all the bars I went to. Their business model seems to be physically pulling in Asian guys and throwing them down on the seats. Some walk out before buying a beer but some buy a drink or ladydrinks. I'm not really good at telling the difference between nationalities but one guy looked like Kim Jong Un so I reckon that there are now many Korean mongers at Nana. Beer was 165 baht. Next door was Casanova which I guess has been open for 20 years or so now. Not many customers but figured if I'm only in Bangkok for one night should spring for a ladydrink. Very nice ladyboy some mutual friendly fiddling so tipped her a 100. My drink was 160 baht. Was working my way around to the staircase on the other side and saw Mercury Bar by that staircase. Girl at the door looked good so I went in. Mostly flat chests and hormone cuties and my Leo was 130 baht which is better than average for the shitpits. Even though I had no intention of paying a barfine, I figured it was my big night out in Bangkok so I'd buy another ladydrink. Sat with a cutie but she wasn't very responsive to me. Had a four beer buzz so hit he street where I knew 700 baht all in ladyboys would be available on Sukhumvit if I saw one I wanted. So for the different reasons I liked Chilli, Casanova, and Mercury but would skip DC 10 next time. YMMV. Btw, i think the two bars by Chilli Bar might be ladyboy bars too, one is named Straps, forget the name of the other and on the other side Temptations is a ladyboy bar but don't like the pressure there so the the 2nd floor has 6 to 8 ladyboys bars. Can anyone confirm?

Trump’s War on Trans Americans Is About to Face a Counterattack The administration is preparing to gut health care protections for transgender people, but civil rights advocates are ready. By MARK JOSEPH STERN APRIL 30, 20186:24 PM President Donald Trump listens to reporters’ questions in the Rose Garden of the White House on Monday in Washington. President Donald Trump listens to reporters’ questions in the Rose Garden of the White House on Monday in Washington. To an extent rarely discussed by the media, Donald Trump’s presidency has been defined by an overwhelming, unrelenting hostility toward the rights of transgender Americans. In just 15 months, the Trump administration has withdrawn federal guidance protecting transgender schoolchildren, employees, and homeless people. It has attempted to outlaw transgender military service and painted trans individuals as disordered deviants who are too mentally unstable to serve. One-third of Trump’s judicial nominees have anti-LGBTQ records, including one who described transgender children as part of “Satan’s plan.” In the coming weeks, the administration will launch its next attack on trans rights by announcing the revocation of a landmark regulation that protects transgender people from discrimination in health care. The Department of Health and Human Services will argue that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors and hospitals from turning away transgender patients, or insurance companies from refusing to cover gender-related treatment. This time around, however, civil rights advocates are prepared to fight back. In fact, they’ve already laid the groundwork for a two-pronged legal attack to maintain the ban on anti-trans health care discrimination. The ACA’s protections for LGBTQ people lie in Section 1557 of the law, which forbids medical providers and insurance companies from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. Like many federal courts, the Obama administration interpreted sex discrimination to encompass discrimination against transgender people on account of their transition from one gender to another. If a medical provider refuses to provide hormone therapy to a transgender man, for instance, it has declined treatment based on his sex, concluding that an individual assigned female at birth should not receive the recommended care. Thus, in May 2016, HHS issued a regulation interpreting Section 1557 to bar discrimination in health care on the basis of transgender status. In the last weeks of Obama’s tenure, U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor issued a nationwide injunction blocking the new rule from taking effect. Texas, which sued to block the rule, was able to maneuver the case in front of O’Connor, who had a track record of sweeping decisions that proscribed the Obama administration from implementing LGBTQ-friendly policies. The judge did not disappoint, finding that the rule violated the “religious freedom” of doctors and insurance companies. He also held that the rule unlawfully extended Section 1557’s protections to transgender people, when in fact “sex discrimination” only encompasses “biological differences between males and females.” This decision flew in the face of Supreme Court precedent defining the contours of gender bias. But instead of appealing it, Trump’s Department of Justice paused the litigation. “New leadership at HHS,” the DOJ told O’Connor in a filing, “has now had time to scrutinize” the trans-inclusive rule and had “concerns as to the need for, reasonableness, and burden imposed by” the policy. Thus, HHS had decided to take “the opportunity to initiate rulemaking proceedings to reconsider the Rule.” Translation: The Trump administration decided to revoke the Obama-era rule and, presumably, replace it with a policy permitting anti-trans discrimination in health care. Now the administration is reportedly poised to do just that. In April, the DOJ informed O’Connor that HHS had finalized the new rule and will publish it once the White House approves. LGBTQ advocates have anticipated this move, preparing two lines of attack against the administration’s imminent rollback of Section 1557. The first took the form of a lawsuit filed against the state of Wisconsin on Monday by the National Health Law Program, the civil rights firm Relman, Dane & Colfax, and the law firm McNally Peterson. The suit, filed on behalf of two transgender Wisconsinites, takes aim at the state’s Medicaid program restrictions, which explicitly exclude coverage of any transition-related treatment. It argues that this exclusion violates Section 1557 as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The Wisconsin lawsuit illustrates an important aspect of Section 1557: It creates a private right to enforce it. That means that while HHS is responsible for enforcing its nondiscrimination protection, individuals can also sue under the law to vindicate their rights independently. Joseph Wardenski, a lead attorney on the case, told me that while he’s disappointed that HHS “is flouting the law and taking a step backwards,” the ACA’s protections remain enforceable. “Section 1557’s statutory prohibition on sex discrimination forbids discrimination against transgender people seeking medically necessary care,” Wardenski said. While the Trump administration may deny that fact, it can’t stop federal courts from enforcing the law. But it’s also not at all clear that HHS can actually get away with gutting Section 1557. The lower courts have developed a sizable body of case law establishing that sex discrimination encompasses anti-trans discrimination. And the Supreme Court itself has ruled that “sex stereotyping”—punishing an individual for not complying with gender norms—constitutes discrimination on the basis of sex. When a medical provider declines to treat a transgender patient because it feels he should comport with the sex assigned to him at birth, it’s denying treatment on the basis of a stereotype. The ACA was designed to strike at the entire spectrum of medical discrimination; it would be rather odd to exclude this clear-cut form of gender-based discrimination from the law’s ambit. For that reason, the American Civil Liberties Union is ready to file suit against HHS as soon as it issues a final rule carving out trans protections from Section 1557. Joshua Block, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU’s LGBT & HIV Project, told me that “from everything we have heard, the proposed rule is based on fundamental errors of law and would jeopardize the health of transgender people.” Moreover, the revision marks an unlawful attempt to rewrite the law in a blatant effort to omit a disfavored minority. Congress directed HHS to bar sex discrimination in health care on the basis of sex; the agency cannot decide to ignore this mandate because it happens to smile upon certain forms of sex discrimination. This debate is not theoretical. A 2015 survey of transgender people found that 33 percent of respondents had experienced health care discrimination, while another 33 percent did not go to a health care provider because they couldn’t afford it. These findings are in line with other studies that indicate rampant anti-transgender discrimination among both doctors and insurers. The ACA was designed to remedy these problems—yet perversely, the Trump administration is attempting to undermine its solutions. Now it’s up to the courts to declare that Section 1557 means what it says. One more thing The Trump administration poses a unique threat to the rule of law. That’s why Slate has stepped up our legal coverage—watchdogging Jeff Sessions’ Justice Department, the Supreme Court, the crackdown on voting rights, and more.

Dutch tourist falls to death from ladyboy’s condo

I reckon not much point overpaying in KL when Phuket is the next port of call.

I downloaded the Grab app and was fooling around with it. It seems n Pattaya for Grab Car the minimum is 130 baht but there are lots of trips for 170 baht such as Tukcom to CentralFestival. TukCom to Soi 6 was 180 baht and Tukcom to TJs 230 baht. Seems handy, if u are going to an inconvenient location with a barfine as an alternative to a motobike taxi. I fund negotiating unpleasant so this makes an evening more peaceful. But if alone, hard for meto imagine not using baht busses. Tukcom to U-Tapao was 850 baht. The rate to Swampy was horrible though, over 2000 baht.

AIS has some good internet add ons. Lots of different plans depending on your needs. If you are living in a place with no internet or very poor internet you can buy an add on for your phone, and use that phone as a Mobile Hotspot to power your other devices. One good plan if you have a 4G phone and Sim is unlimited internet with a max download speed of 6Mbps. This is fast enough for very good video streaming. 550 baht plus tax coming out to about 590 baht per month. *777*7211# . If your phone or Sim is 3G though I think the speed is only 4Mbps so getting a 6Mbps plan is a waste of money. If your phone or Sim is 3G then there is a plan with unlimited internet and a download speed of 4Mbps which is also good enough for video streaming. *777*7155# 450 baht plus tax. If you have pretty good wifi in your room then a plan which gives you 2GB of data valid for 30 days might fit the bill. This should be enough for when you are out and about and also as a backup if the wifi in your room craps out. 239 baht plus tax. So if you are at a place with wifi, then just turn off your Mobile Data and connect to the place's Wifi. *777*75# For most guys, if the internet in your room is OK and you generally frequent bars and restaurants that have wifi, AIS has a great daily plan that gives you 500 MB of data good for 24 hours. Taking the Bell Bus to Swampy? This package should give you enough data for the trip and airport useage. *777*7026# . Just 19 baht plus tax. Very useful on an adhoc basis. The thing to be careful about with all the plans is that if you use up your data or time validity you get charged at regular rates which are quite high. There might be some better plans that might fit your length of stay better. http://www.ais.co.th/one-2-call/addon/en/nonstop.html http://www.ais.co.th/one-2-call/addon/en/maxspeed.html I suppose True and DTAC have similar plans but I don't know much about them. Anyone have other favorite data add ons?

A Farang came into Kiss Bar on 2nd Road when it was closed and defecated on the floor. Caught on the CCTV camera but didn't steal anything.

The grand tour begins! So the bus from Singapore to KL was about the same price as a pint of Tiger! Surprises me also that trash bins were overflowing. Had the impression it was cleaner than Switzerland! Love the detail SJ, very useful!

So are baht busses back to normal or are they only stopping at designated points on certain routes?

is it 25 baht plus the meter or in some cases is there no meter?

Police in Pattaya raided a drug fuelled sex party at a hotel in the resort town on Saturday night. Local police, immigration officers and Tourist Police carried out the raid after reports that the 30 room hotel located in the Nong Prue area was being used to host sex and swinging parties. As many as 25 people were found to be taking part in the orgy including nationals from United States, Canada, China, Malaysia, Singapore, Germany, Thailand, Cambodia, India and Ukraine. A search of the property also found sex drugs, toys and lubricants, while used condoms found in the trash were taken as evidence, Siamchon News reported. Police revealed that the people paid 1,500 baht to attend the party, which was advertised online. Police also arrested Mr. Sheng Liao Yang, 53, from China who said he was the owner of the hotel. Mr Yang was charged with a number of offences related to hosting the sex parties and also operating a hotel without a valid license. Details of the case has been sent to prosecutors. Times comment:- The party was advertised online? So the police don’t bother checking social media for such events? These idiots deserve all that’s coming to them ! http://www.khonkaentimes.com/scores-foreigners-detained-police-raid-sex-orgy-pattaya/

Think the reason there were only 12 Ladyboy Red Cards in Pattaya is that most have to go back to their province for the draft. It seems silicone will exempt them but bone spurs in the foot won't.

Good to hear you had a great time Outlander! Hey guys just a reminder that the links on this page will only bring you to the specific girl linked to if you are already a Thai Friendly member. No worries, if not a member you can join for free; here is a link to the Thai Friendly Ladyboy Homepage where you can sign up for a free membership.

Where are the races Cobber? Easy to get to? When is post time?