Leaderboard

https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cambridge.org%2Fcore%2Fjournals%2Fpsychological-medicine%2Farticle%2Fabs%2Fwho-are-gynandromorphophilic-men-characterizing-men-with-sexual-interest-in-transgender-women%2FC53A4234C8AD66052EEB4701E78A82BE%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR2p5_gTPx-r-vCXYmtVVemrEPovACFV7Lt6e51OTlRYQe7baSft6EZ92TE&h=AT0huoPVHe1Rhc9tPIBWnfrnyU1RR-ej6qDSDiC6XNWsi-rZqzt83ITH_JD_q63YDk9PZp2d1V9xV2juYQ0c4xsb4HwUzhJuM_1zaUOv5H188aqPl0zBEJc4cUo Gynandromorphophilia (GAMP) is sexual interest in gynandromorphs (GAMs; colloquially, shemales). Results provide clear evidence that GAMP men are not homosexual. They also indicate that GAMP men are especially likely to eroticize the idea of being a woman. Not sure about that second part. No one seems to take into account that some guys just like BEING penetrated more than the typical male role of penetrator. Obviously this is more widespread than previously believed judging by recent years online references to "pegging" becoming almost a normal thing. an interesting chat about trans attracted men is on Shannyn Martin's youTube channel as "The Truth About Trans-Attracted Men".

I have always been one who believes it's not gay to feel attraction for shemales/ladyboys. We're attracted to their female appearance. I'm almost exclusively a top so that helps. Admittedly it's harder to convince myself of the non-gayness of it when I have a lb's throbbing cock in my gob!

are you sure that's not, WOW WOW!

Another newbie ... enjoy the new Tonkhaw, The other Tonkhaw unfortunately left CIB. First pic together with PaoPao. Credits to CIB facebook.

Wow, it must be so then.

I just meant that capitalism deals sole with numbers giving them an easy OUT on the question of morality, etc. LOS is playing a theoretical game, which if we are unlucky, may take them 10 or 20 years to amend. Many of us will be past traveling age or dead by then. I will continue to avoid touristy locations like the plague, and do what I always do, hit the outlying areas staying with Thai friends on occasion. I'm there for the whole package...got too old to do any real mongering. Heat, food, wacky sights, etc. Oh and lots of hammock time. I just wish the bastards would pull their head out of their ass concerning cigars and pipe tobacco as the only available are few and FAR between and I am not setting fire to a $40 cigar. The two places I found that have pipe tobacco sell it for roughly $15 per pouch, and have VERY few selections. They should let long stayers bring their own stash if Thai's cannot supply it. You ain't gonna find any Gawith and Hogarth Balkan blend in LOS. Half pound is gone in 6 weeks or so. But I digress.

Why is it now, that everything has to be over thought, over analyzed, and over defined. Can't yeah just like something and just do it, without psychoanalysis.

and in this post CV era they are ALL trying to make BACK what they consider they should have been making during that time which is just STUPID, but typical capitalist crap. Seems to ME that if they relaxed things to the pre CV era and LOWERED prices they'd have a MUCH FASTER rebound. Using tourists as some sort of financial insurance to cover losses is, dare I say it again? STUPID. If they had a third foot they'd be shooting IT too. Underlying all this is the fact that they want to upscale tourism in LOS in a big way, so they will charge ahead with this idea I am sure. I find this to be in direct opposition to their airport expansion claim that they'll be able to hande 60 million or is it 80 million visitors a YEAR. IF you manage to cut tourist numbers down by half with the SAME income as the 40 million year, ecology and other things would benefit but NO WAY are they going to cut out the average tourist groups and budget travellers which, let's face it, MADE LOS the premium destination it was.